Effect of Bone Resorption Inhibitors on Serum Cholesterol Level and Fracture Risk in Osteoporosis: Randomized Comparative Study Between Minodronic Acid and Raloxifene.

The positive link between osteoporosis and hypercholesterolemia has been documented, and bone resorption inhibitors, such as nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BP) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), are known to reduce serum cholesterol levels. However, the relationship between the baseline cholesterol level and incident fracture rate under the treatment using the bone resorption inhibitors has not been documented. We investigated the relation between vertebral fracture incident and the baseline cholesterol levels and cholesterol-lowering effect of N-BP and SERM in osteoporosis through a prospective randomized open-label study design. Patients with osteoporosis (n = 3986) were allocated into two groups based on the drug used for treatment: minodronic acid (MIN) (n = 1624) as an N-BP and raloxifene (RLX) as an SERM (n = 1623). Serum levels of cholesterol and incidence of vertebral fracture were monitored for 2 years. The vertebral fracture rates between the two groups were compared using the pre-specified stratification factors. The patients receiving MIN with baseline low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level of ≥ 140 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < 40 mg/dL, age group of ≥ 75 years, and T score of BMD ≥ -3 SD had significantly lower vertebral fracture rates than those receiving RLX (incidence rate ratios (IRR) 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 0.75, p = 0.001], 0.25 [95% CI 0.09 0.65, p = 0.005], 0.71 [95% CI 0.56 0.91, p = 0.006], 0.47 [95% CI 0.30 0.75, p = 0.0012], respectively). The cholesterol-lowering effect was stronger in the RLX group than in the MIN group, regardless of prior statin use. These results indicated that MIN treatment was more effective in reducing fracture risk in patients with higher LDL cholesterol levels, although its cholesterol-lowering ability was lesser than the RLX treatment.Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), No. UMIN000005433; date: April 13, 2011.

Predictive Value of the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index for Cardiovascular Events in Patients at Cardiovascular Risk.

Background Arterial stiffness is an important predictor of cardiovascular events; however, indexes for measuring arterial stiffness have not been widely incorporated into routine clinical practice. This study aimed to determine whether the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), based on the blood pressure-independent stiffness parameter ß and reflecting arterial stiffness from the origin of the ascending aorta, is a good predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease risk factors in a large prospective cohort. Methods and Results This multicenter prospective cohort study, commencing in May 2013, with a 5-year follow-up period, included patients (aged 40‒74 years) with cardiovascular disease risks. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Among 2932 included patients, 2001 (68.3%) were men; the mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 63 (8) years. During the median follow-up of 4.9 years, 82 participants experienced primary outcomes. The CAVI predicted the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.16‒1.65; P<0.001). In terms of event subtypes, the CAVI was associated with cardiovascular death and stroke but not with myocardial infarction. When the CAVI was incorporated into a model with known cardiovascular disease risks for predicting cardiovascular events, the global χ2 value increased from 33.8 to 45.2 (P<0.001), and the net reclassification index was 0.254 (P=0.024). Conclusions This large cohort study demonstrated that the CAVI predicted cardiovascular events. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01859897.

Trends in Hip Fracture Incidence in Japan: Estimates Based on Nationwide Hip Fracture Surveys From 1992 to 2017.

As of 2015, the aging population in Japan was the largest in the world. Although the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB) was developed in 2012, long-term trends regarding hip fracture incidence in Japan remain unclear. In order to clarify the trend in hip fracture incidence from 1992 to 2017, we estimated the number of new hip fractures in 2017, the seventh in a series of nationwide hip fracture surveys performed every 5 years since 1987. We also investigated regional differences in hip fracture incidence. We collected data through a nationwide mail-in survey of orthopedic institutions in Japan and calculated hip fracture incidence by sex and age, as well as standardized incidence ratio (SIR) across 12 districts. The total number (95% confidence interval) of hip fractures in 2017 was estimated at 193,400 (187,300-199,500), occurring in 44,100 (42,700-45,500) males and 149,300 (144,500-154,100) females. Of all the hip fracture surveys from 1992 to 2017, the 5-year hip fracture increase rates from 2012 to 2017 was the lowest among female patients. In males, the 5-year rates from 2012 to 2017 were lower than those from 2007 to 2012. The age-adjusted incidence rates for patients in both sexes did not show significant change in the 25-year period. The estimated incidence rates in 2017 for patients aged 70 to 79 years in both sexes were lowest from 1992 to 2017, and declined significantly over the 25-year period. SIRs differed between northeast and southwest regions. Our findings were similar to those from a previous study in Japan using the NDB from 2012 to 2015. Progress in the development of osteoporosis medication may contribute to the continuous decline in the 70-year to 79-year age group. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Impact of bone mineral density in reducing fracture risk in patients receiving alendronate plus alfacalcidol therapy.

BACKGROUD: Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) are a potential surrogate marker for fracture endpoints in clinical trials. However little is known whether the increase in BMD in response to combination treatment with alendronate plus alfacalcidol is associated with fracture risk reduction. We aimed to evaluate the impact of BMD on fracture risk in osteoporosis patients, using the data from the randomized clinical trial comparing alendronate plus alfacalcidol with alendronate alone. METHODS: We selected 412 patients with two or more prevalent vertebral fractures and who had BMD measurements at baseline and after 6, 12, and/or 24 months out of 2022 patients from the database of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial. Patients in this subset who received combination treatment with alendronate plus alfacalcidol had shown a lower risk of fracture than patients treated with alendronate alone. We used Poisson regression model analysis to calculate the proportion of treatment effect (PTE) that was attributable to BMD increases in patients receiving combination treatment. RESULTS: The highest PTE attributable to changes in BMD was 1.2% in patients with a BMD increase of 3% or more in the lumbar spine. For BMD measurements of the radius, the highest PTE was 2.8% with a BMD increase of 0% or more. For BMD measurements of the metacarpal bone, the highest PTE was 1.2% with a BMD increase of 3% or more. In patients with a BMD greater than or equal to 70% of the young adult mean in the lumbar spine, the PTE attributable to BMD was 0.2%. In patients with a BMD greater than or equal to 70% of the young adult mean in the radius, the PTE attributable to BMD was 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The additional effects of alfacalcidol in reducing fracture risk do not likely result from increased BMD; other mechanisms remain a possibility.

Randomized head-to-head comparison of minodronic acid and raloxifene for fracture incidence in postmenopausal Japanese women: the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04.

AIMS: We conducted a head-to-head randomized trial of minodronate, a bisphosphonate, and raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, to obtain clinical evidence and information about their efficacy and safety. METHODS: The Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 (JOINT-04) trial is a multi-center, open-labeled, blinded endpoints, head-to-head randomized trial of minodronate and raloxifene. Ambulatory elderly women with osteoporosis (age, >60 years) were randomly allocated to the raloxifene or minodronate group by central registration. The co-primary endpoints included any one of osteoporotic fractures (vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial fractures), vertebral fractures, and major osteoporotic fractures (clinical vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial fractures). The biological effects of each drug, patients' quality of life, and drug safety were assessed based on the secondary outcomes. This study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) under trial identification number UMIN000005433. RESULTS: A total of 3896 patients were randomized to the minodronate and raloxifene groups, and drug efficacy assessments were performed for 3247 patients (1623 and 1624 patients, respectively). Among these patients, 1176 and 1187 patients received allocated treatment for 2 years. The incidence rate ratios for osteoporotic, vertebral, and major osteoporotic fractures in the minodronate group were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.78-1.13, p = .494), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.70-1.05, p = .147), and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.86-1.74, p = .274), respectively. Compared to the raloxifene group, the minodronate group showed significantly increased bone mineral density of the lumbar spine for each visit (6 months: p = .007, 12 months: p = .0003, 24 months: p<.0001). Also, serious adverse reactions were observed for four and six patients in the minodronate and raloxifene groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there were no statistical differences in the incidence rates of osteoporotic, vertebral, or major osteoporotic fractures between the two groups. Serious adverse reactions were rare in both groups.

Incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in Japanese osteoporosis patients taking minodronic acid.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) associated with bisphosphonate therapy is a rare but severe side effect in osteoporosis patients. Recently, the number of osteoporosis patients with ONJ has dramatically increased in Japan. This has contributed to an increase in the number of patients avoiding extractions. However, there has been no prospective study providing definitive incidence data for ONJ in Japanese patients. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the true as well as suspected incidence of ONJ. A total of 3229 subjects (1612 subjects in the minodronic acid group and 1617 subjects in the raloxifene group) in the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 participated in this study. ONJ was diagnosed by experienced dentists. Suspected Stage 0 and 1 (bone exposure of the jaw) ONJ was assessed by a structured questionnaire at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. No established ONJ cases were diagnosed during the study. The incidence of suspected Stage 0 and/or Stage 1 ONJ was 6.14 per 1000 patient-years in the minodronic acid group and 3.38 per 1000 patient-years in the raloxifene group [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.82 (0.84-3.93), P = 0.13]. Approximately 50-60% of bone exposures that appeared during the study had disappeared at the next observation. Although the subjects in this study may have developed a greater interest in the health of the oral cavity, the incidence of ONJ after minodronic acid treatment would be lower than the expected incident rate.

Study design of multi-center, open-label randomized controlled, head-to-head trial comparing minodronic acid and raloxifene: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04.

We planned to conduct multi-center, open-labeled, blinded-endpoints, head-to-head randomized trial of minodronate and raloxifene to compare incidences of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. The study is the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 (JOINT-4). Here, we present the pre-fixed study design. The inclusion criteria are ambulatory older women with osteoporosis, aged > 60 years, and without pre-specified risk factors for secondary osteoporosis and dementia. The subjects who meet selection criteria will be randomly allocated to the raloxifene (60 mg/day) or minodronate (1 mg/day or 50 mg/4 weeks) groups using the central registry. The co-primary endpoints are osteoporotic (vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial), vertebral, and major osteoporotic (clinical vertebral, humeral, femoral, and radial) fractures. Furthermore, we plan to use the Hochberg procedure to preserve an overall type 1 error rate. In addition, changes in bone mineral density (BMD), hip-structure analysis (HSA) variables, height, bone turnover markers, serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, dental health questionnaire, fall frequency, fall risk index, nursing care level, physical function, quality of life (QOL), and safety profiles were assessed as secondary endpoints. To detect 24% reduction of major osteoporotic fractures with 80% power and a two-sided significance level of 5% with a 2-year observation period, 1734 patients/treatment arm would be required. Subgroup analysis stratified to the following factors age, body mass index, BMD, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), prevalent vertebral fracture number, hypertension status, and diabetes mellitus is pre-specified. The protocol is registered in the trial registry system, and the trial identification number is UMIN000005433.

Protocol for Evaluating the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index to Predict Cardiovascular Events in Japan: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) was developed in Japan and is a blood pressure-independent index of arterial stiffness from the origin of the aorta to the ankle. In recent years, it has been studied by many researchers worldwide, and it is strongly anticipated that it will play a role as a predictive factor for arteriosclerotic diseases. The objective of this study was to examine the benefits of using CAVI as a predictor of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. METHODS AND DESIGN: This prospective multicenter study to evaluate the usefulness of the CAVI to predict cardiovascular events in Japan (CAVI-J) is a cohort study with central registration. Participants (n = 3,000) will be scheduled to enroll and data will be collected for up to 5 years from entry of participants into the study. To be eligible to participate in the CAVI-J study, individuals have to be aged between 40 and 74 years and have at least one of the following risk factors for arteriosclerosis: (1) type 2 diabetes mellitus; (2) high-risk hypertension; (3) metabolic syndrome; (4) chronic kidney disease (stage 3), or (5) history of coronary artery disease or noncardiogenic cerebral infarction. The primary endpoints of this study are cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. The secondary endpoints are composite cardiovascular events including all cause death, angina pectoris with revascularization, new incidence of peripheral artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, heart failure requiring hospitalization, and deterioration in renal function. The cutoff for CAVI against the incidence of cardiovascular events will be determined.

Decreased rate of hip fracture and consequent reduction in estimated medical costs in Japan.

The frequency of hip fractures associated with aging of the population is declining in many countries. Even in Japan, where this frequency has been increasing continually, a shift to decreasing frequency has been noted in recent reports. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of this decrease and to estimate the number of hip fracture patients and the resulting reduction in national medical care expenditures. The differences in the number of patients were estimated by multiplying the population for each sex and each age group by the fracture rates before the decrease (2007) and after the decrease (2012). Total reduced cost was calculated by multiplying the treatment cost required for hip fracture and the annual medical cost of nursing care. The estimated number of hip fracture patients decreased by approximately 4000 in the elderly female population, and the resulting reduction in medical costs was approximately US$280 million. The number of patients with hip fractures has decreased in elderly Japanese women; as a result, the medical costs for treatment and nursing care might decrease.

Understanding the factors associated with initiation and adherence of osteoporosis medication in Japan: An analysis of patient perceptions.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify factors associated with initiation and adherence of osteoporosis medication from a patient perspective. METHODS: A web-based survey was developed based on health behavior theories. Descriptive analyses were conducted for all survey items. Analyses in a structural equation modeling framework were conducted to identify factors associated with treatment initiation and adherence. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-five women completed the questionnaire. A majority were currently receiving medications for osteoporosis (n = 376, 69.0%) and 25.0% of these patients (n = 94) were considered adherent to their treatment. Knowledge was strongly associated with osteoporosis treatment initiation (standard error [SE], 0.58). Greater knowledge of disease was associated with increased likelihood of initiating medication. Medication complexity (SE, 0.49) and perceived susceptibility to fracture and loss of independence (SE, -0.37) were also associated with initiation. Perceived barriers (SE, -0.85) such as inconvenience, lack of efficacy and financial burden were observed to be the greatest obstacle to adherence. The greater the perceived barriers, the less likely patients were to adhere to medication. Patients' perception of self-efficacy (SE, 0.37) also affected adherence. The greater the patient perception of ability to independently manage their medication, the more likely they were to adhere to the medication. CONCLUSIONS: Different factors were found to be associated with initiation and adherence of osteoporosis medication. Patient knowledge of their disease and the perception of barriers were found to be the most influential. Empowering patients with the knowledge to better understand their disease and decreasing the perception of barriers through education initiatives may be effective in improving patient outcomes.

Comparison of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate compared with treatment with risedronate alone in patients with osteoporosis: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-03.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate compared with treatment with risedronate alone in patients with osteoporosis and to explore subsets of patients for which concurrent treatment is particularly efficacious. Women with osteoporosis aged 65 years or older were recruited from 123 institutes in Japan and allocated to take either vitamin K2 (45 mg/day) and risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) or risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) alone. The primary end point was the incidence of any fracture (vertebral and nonvertebral). The secondary end points were bone mineral density, height, undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentration, quality of life, and safety. Over a 2-year follow-up, vertebral or nonvertebral fractures occurred in 117 or 22 sites respectively among 931 patients in the risedronate and vitamin K2 group and in 104 or 26 sites respectively among 943 patients in the risedronate alone group. The rates of any incident fracture were similar between the two groups (incidence rate ratio 1.074, 95 % confidence interval 0.811-1.422, p = 0.62), implying that the primary end point was not met. There were no differences in the degree of increase in bone mineral density between the two groups. Undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentration decreased from 5.81 ± 3.93 ng/mL to 2.59 ± 1.52 ng/mL at 6 months in the risedronate and vitamin K2 group, whereas the change in the risedronate alone group was minimal (from 5.96 ± 4.36 ng/mL to 4.05 ± 3.40 ng/mL at 6 months) (p < 0.01). The treatment discontinuation rate was higher in the risedronate and vitamin K2 group than in the risedronate alone group (10.0 % vs 6.7 %). No unknown adverse drug reactions were reported. In conclusion, concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate was not efficacious compared with monotherapy with risedronate in terms of fracture prevention.

Impact of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw on Osteoporosis Treatment in Japan: Results of a Questionnaire-Based Survey by the Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP) Research Group.

Dentists request a discontinuation of antiresorptive agents, such as bisphosphonate, before and after tooth extractions to prevent osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). However, little is known about how this affects ONJ and osteoporosis treatment and how medical professionals and dentists cooperate to treat ONJ in patients with osteoporosis. This study aimed to clarify the impact of ONJ on osteoporosis treatment in Japan. A structured questionnaire including 14 key clinical queries was sent to 488 medical professionals as part of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04, and 206 responses were received. A total of 173 respondents had received discontinuation requests from dentists. Of these, 28 respondents experienced 30 adverse events including ten fractures and one incidence of ONJ. The respondents who refused discontinuation requests observed no cases of ONJ. Approximately 16 % of respondents had patients who discontinued osteoporosis treatment, following a requested drug discontinuation, after tooth extraction. Dentists requested discontinuations for many medications that were not associated with the incidence of ONJ. Approximately 76 % of respondents had never requested oral health care from dentists before osteoporosis treatment and 72 % reported no cooperation between dentists and medical professionals in their region. Our results suggest that drug discontinuation may increase adverse events and disturb osteoporosis treatment without completely preventing ONJ. Currently, both medical professionals and dentists in Japan still continue to recommend their own treatment position. A forum to share information about ONJ among medical professionals, dentists, and patients is required.

Comparison of expert and nonexpert physicians in the assessment of vertebral fractures using the semiquantitative method in Japan.

Assessment of vertebral fracture is critically important for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of the semiquantitative (SQ) method in the assessment of vertebral fractures in Japanese clinical practice. Forty-four physicians (seven experts and 37 nonexperts) assessed the spinal radiographs of 40 patients participating in the Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP) Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-02 at the baseline, 12 months, and 24 months using the SQ method. The proportion of diagnosed fracture cases per spine was higher in the nonexpert group than in the expert group at each time point, and was especially high in the upper thoracic spine (T4-T6). The least mean squares spinal fracture index was significantly higher in the nonexpert group than in the expert group for all time points. The kappa statistics were also higher in the expert group than in the nonexpert group for all vertebral levels at all time points. Assessment of vertebral fractures using the SQ method tended to be overestimated by nonexpert physicians compared with the experts, with poor nonexpert interobserver reliability and well-matched expert interobserver reliability. Conscious efforts to avoid overestimation and to obtain higher reliability with the SQ method should be made to achieve more precise diagnoses and treatment of osteoporosis in Japanese clinical practice.

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level as an independent determinant of quality of life in osteoporosis with a high risk for fracture.

BACKGROUND: Deteriorated quality of life (QOL) is a major problem in osteoporotic women. However, little is known regarding the determinants of QOL in patients with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore the role of vitamin D status on QOL score in osteoporosis with high fracture risk. METHODS: Patients were osteoporotic women aged ≥70 years and with ≥1 risk factor for incident fracture, namely prevalent osteoporotic fracture, bone mineral density (BMD) >-3.0 SD of young adult mean, or high bone turnover marker. Health-related QOL was assessed using the Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JOQOL). When patients were classified into quartiles by total QOL score). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level was measured by immunoassay. RESULTS: A total of 1585 osteoporotic women were included in the study (age range, 70-95 years). Age, body mass index, serum 25(OH)D status (low, normal, or high), bone mineral density, number of prevalent vertebral fractures, presence of hypertension, presence of osteoarthritis, and history of falls were significantly correlated with QOL quartile. Multivariate liner regression analysis indicated that low serum 25(OH)D level (<20 ng/mL) was an independent determinant of total QOL score quartile (P = 0.0055). The conventional determinants of QOL-age (P < 0.0001), body mass index (P = 0.0060), number of prevalent vertebral fractures (P < 0.0001), presence of osteoarthritis (P = 0.0074), and history of fall (P = 0.0098)-were also independent determinants of total QOL score. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly suggest that low serum 25(OH)D level was a significant determinant of QOL in these osteoporotic women, independently of the conventional factors that reduce QOL. Maintenance of serum 25(OH)D levels >20 ng/mL may be required to maintain patients' QOL in osteoporosis.

A randomized intervention trial of 24-wk dairy consumption on waist circumference, blood pressure, and fasting blood sugar and lipids in Japanese men with metabolic syndrome.

UNLABELLED: Dairy foods are postulated to have beneficial effects on blood pressure, body fat, serum lipids, and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. To evaluate the effects of the consumption of milk and dairy products, we performed a randomized dietary intervention trial for 24 wk in Japanese men, aged 20 to 60 y, with 2 or more components of the metabolic syndrome ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000006353). Subjects were randomized to a control group (n=98) that received dietary intervention focused on weight control supervised by registered dietitians, and a dairy-consumption group (n=102) that received both dietary intervention and regular home dairy delivery of 400 g/d for 24 wk. Co-primary endpoints included waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting blood sugar (FBS), and serum lipids. The dietary intervention decreased energy intake from 2,150 to 1,850 kcal/d in both groups (p<0.01). Mean rates of compliance with the dairy-consumption intervention were over 90%, resulting in increased calcium intake in the dairy-consumption group from 329 to 667 mg/d (p<0.01). Co-primary endpoints improved in both groups, but the degree of improvement was smaller in the dairy-consumption group (one-sided p=0.99). Subgroup analyses specified in the study protocol identified weight and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) as significant effect modifiers. Differences in changes in systolic blood pressure compared with the control group were 28.0 mmHg (95% CI, 214.0 to 21.9, interaction; p<0.01) in the normal weight group and 25.8 mmHg (211.4 to 20.2, interaction; p=0.02) in the moderate-to-high LTPA group, indicating lower systolic blood pressure in the dairy-consumption group among participants in these subgroups. In conclusion, although effects on the co-primary endpoints of dairy consumption were not shown, dairy consumption lowered systolic blood pressure in the subgroups with normal weight and moderate-to-high LTPA and lowered FBS in the subgroup with normal weight.

Design of a randomized clinical trial of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate compared to risedronate alone in osteoporotic patients: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-03 (JOINT-03).

Concurrent treatments with bisphosphonates and vitamin K are promising given that bisphosphonates possibly interfere with vitamin K activation. This is a prospective, multi-center, open-labeled, randomized trial of the efficacy of concurrent treatment with vitamin K2 and risedronate compared with risedronate alone and to explore subsets of patients for which concurrent treatment is particularly efficacious (trial identification number UMIN000000991). Inclusion criteria are women who meet the criteria for pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis, aged ≥65 years, have any of pre-specified risk factors, can walk unassisted, and are able to answer questionnaires. Exclusion criteria are prior warfarin use, secondary osteoporosis or non-osteoporotic metabolic bone diseases, contraindication for vitamin K2 and risedronate, hyper- or hypoparathyroidism, mental disorders, prevalent vertebral fracture at ≥6 sites, severe degenerative spinal deformation between T4 and L4, serious heart, liver, or kidney disease, or bisphosphonate use within the previous 6 months. Patients were recruited from 123 institutes between January 2008 and February 2010, and allocated to vitamin K2 (45 mg/day) and risedronate (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) or risedronate alone (2.5 mg/day or 17.5 mg/week) groups. Primary endpoint is a vertebral or non-vertebral fracture. Secondary endpoints are bone mineral density, height, undercarboxylated osteocalcin, JOQOL, EQ-5D and safety. A sample size of 910 subjects per group and 2-year follow-up will provide 80 % power to detect 35 % risk reduction for fracture, with a two-sided significance level of 5 %. Subgroup analysis stratified to adjustment factors for random allocation, body mass index, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, estimated glomerular filtration rate, grade of vertebral fracture, JOQOL, EQ-5D, and co-morbidity is pre-specified.

Japanese 2011 guidelines for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis--executive summary.

INTRODUCTION: In 1998, the first Japanese practice guidelines on osteoporosis was published. It has been updated several times, with the most recent being the full-scale 2011 edition and its abridged edition. The present guidelines provide information for the managements of primary osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men over 50 years old, a summary of the evidence for the treatment of secondary osteoporosis, and a summary of the evidence for the prevention of osteoporosis in younger people. METHOD: The present Executive Summary is primarily based on the content of the 2011 Japanese abridged edition. One of the key changes is revision of the criteria for initiation of pharmacological treatment, along with an introduction of the fracture risk factors used in FRAX®. Key figures and tables were selected from the Japanese abridged edition and a reference list was added. RESULT AND CONCLUSIONS: The essential points of the Japanese practice guidelines on osteoporosis were translated into English for the first time. It is hoped that the content of the guidelines becomes known throughout the world.

[Bone and calcium update; diagnosis and therapy of metabolic bone disease update. Guideline for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis update].

The outline of Japanese Guideline for the prevention and treatment of Osteoporosis (up dated 2011) was introduced. Descriptions were made on the identification of risk factors for fracture, prevention of osteoporosis, criteria for initiating pharmacotherapy to prevent fracture. Grading of recommendation for medication based on evidence, introduction of bone turnover markers in the treatment and secondary osteoporosis.

Effects of alendronate plus alfacalcidol in osteoporosis patients with a high risk of fracture: the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT) - 02.

OBJECTIVES: The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to clarify the efficacy and safety of alendronate plus alfacalcidol versus alendronate alone in a clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis who were aged 70 years or older and had several risk factors for incident fractures. The primary endpoint was prevention of incident fractures, and the anti-fracture efficacy was evaluated in relation to the baseline serum 25(OH)D level. RESULTS: A total of 2164 patients were randomized to alendronate plus alfacalcidol (combination therapy) or alendronate alone (monotherapy). Although the overall difference in the incidence of vertebral fracture between the two groups was not significant, the combination therapy group had a significantly reduced risk of vertebral fractures after the first 6 months (HR, 0.53). In subgroup analyses, the combination therapy group was superior in the strata of number of prevalent vertebral fractures of ≥2 (HR, 0.51) and grade 3 of prevalent vertebral fractures (HR, 0.55). The rate of non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fractures was significantly lower in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group during the follow-up period (HR, 0.31). A lower baseline 25(OH)D level was associated with a higher incidence of non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fractures (HR, 3.42) despite alendronate use. Although one patient given the combination therapy had mild hypercalcemia, serious hypercalcemia and unknown adverse events were not encountered. Because of the limitations presented in this study, these results may not apply to female patients with longer than 2 years of treatments, and to male osteoporosis patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination therapy was no more effective for overall vertebral fracture prevention. However, subgroup analysis has shown that it was more effective for fracture prevention in patients with severe vertebral deformity, multiple prevalent vertebral fractures, and for non-vertebral weight-bearing bone fracture prevention.